Access Scioto County Public Transit

2009 Year End Report

Home
About Us
Mission Statement
How to Ride
Scheduling
Fare Information
Routes
Cancellations
ASC Grid Map
Hours
En Espanol
Customer Survey
Public Hearing
ASC Office Roof Project
Annual Report
Quality Assurance Review
Funders
Contact Us
Links
News
History

System Description

 

Access Scioto County (ASC) is Scioto County, Ohio’s (76,587 est. 2008) public transit system.

 

ASC operates under the auspices of the Scioto County Commissioners and provides curb-to-curb, shared ride, demand response transportation service to the city of Portsmouth, all of Scioto County and South Shore, KY. (612 sq. mi.). The service operates Monday through Friday from 6:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. and service requires at least 24-hour advance reservation.

 

The mission of ASC is to provide safe, reliable, affordable and efficient public transportation throughout the Scioto County area regardless of age, race, income or disability.

 

ASC is funded in part by grants from the Federal Transit Administration, the Ohio Department of Transportation’s (ODOT) Office of Transit and from contract revenue from Scioto County Job and Family Services.

History

Access Scioto County (ASC) grew out of a grass-roots effort in the early 1990's by concerned citizens, civic groups, social service and government agencies and others that came together to work towards establishing a countywide public transportation system to provide transportation for those in Scioto County who did not have a reliable means of transportation.


In September of 1993, the Scioto County Commissioners and this group, which was called the Scioto County Transportation Committee, received from the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) a Coordinated Transportation grant.


This grant provided funding for capital and technical assistance to facilitate the establishment of a coordinated transportation project in Scioto County and included funds for the hiring of a transportation consultant to help guide the group.


In 1994 the Scioto County Commissioners appointed a steering committee to work with ODOT officials and transportation consultants to continue to development the coordination project that had been renamed Access Scioto County and to recruit a Transportation Coordinator to manage the project.

 

Members of the committee included Dave Ross (Chairman) of Scioto County MRDD, Ruby Grant (Vice-Chairman) of Scioto County Dept. of Human Services, Renee Ellis (Secretary), U.S.S.A, Inc., Jim Gerard of Scioto County Schools, Ann Sydnor of Portsmouth City Council and Scioto County C.A.O., Sue Camp of Scioto County Children’s Services and Jeanie Miller of Portsmouth City Schools.

 

In 1995 the Scioto County Commissioners on the advice of the steering committee appointed Valerie Stamper as the first ASC Coordinator.

 

As a coordination project under ODOT’s Specialized Transit Program, ASC established partnerships with several local agencies, including Scioto County MRDD, United Scioto Senior Activities, Inc., RSVP, and others that were already providing transportation to provided transportation services for elderly persons and persons with disabilities. 

 

The first passengers were transported by ASC as part of the coordination project in 1996.  That year 6,139 passengers were transported by ASC.  

 

In 1998 ASC transitioned from a coordination project to becoming one of Ohio’s rural public transit systems under the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA) Rural Transit Program.

 

Under this program, which is administered by ODOT’s Office of Transit, ASC was eligible to receive not only capital and technical assistance, but also state and federal funds for operating expenses.   Up to this point funds to operate ASC had been provided at the local level mainly from the Scioto County Commissioners.

 

The most significant change in moving from a coordination project and becoming a public transit system was ASC transitioned from only providing transportation for the elderly and disabled to being open to the public and providing transportation services available to anyone in Scioto County.  

 

Through the continuing support of the public, FTA, ODOT and the Scioto County Commissioners ASC continues to grow and develop and today provide service to the public through out all of Scioto County and South Shore, Kentucky.   

 

Everyday hundreds of people from all over the area, of all ages use ASC to travel to work, school, shopping, medical appointments and other destinations throughout the Scioto County area.

2009 Personnel

 

 

ASC employed 16 people in 2009, which included 4 administrative staff, 2 operational staff and 10 drivers.   This compares to 19 employees in 2008.

 

The 2009 ASC Staff members included:

 

Leroy Hackworth, Transportation Specialist/Dispatcher, employed since 1996

Penny Hubbard, Office Manager/Dispatcher, employed since 1999

Wanda Leedom, Administrative Assistant/Driver, employed since 1996

Dave McNutt, Driver, employed since 2008

John McNutt, Driver, employed since 1999

Larry Mullins, Coordinator/Driver, employed since 1998

Bill Potts, Driver, employed since 1999

Lisa Potts, Operations Manager/Dispatcher, employed since 2000

Rick Potts, Lead Driver, employed since 1999

Brian Setser, Driver, employed since 1999

Nathan Potts, Driver, employed since 2005

Robert Donahoe, Driver, who rejoined the staff in 2006 after sick leave

Tom Lancaster, Driver, employed since 2006

Barb Setser, Driver/Maintenance, employed since 2006

 

 

New additions to the ASC staff in 2008 included Chris Hollis and Cody Rankins

 

Resignations in 2009 included Kelly Hatfield and Rachel Oppy. 

Safety Awards

 

The ASC Safety Award program was established in 2000 to recognize each driver that logs at least 1500 hours during the year without a preventable accident, moving violation, unexplained damage to their bus or report of unsafe behavior reported by the public.

 

The program was established to promote safety consciousness among our drivers and to reward those that demonstrate a commitment to safe driving.

                                                   

Drivers that earned safety awards in 2009 included Rick Potts for 10 years of safe driving, Bill Potts and Brian Setser for 4 years of safe driving, Robert Donahoe and John Mc Nutt for 3 years safe driving, Nathan Potts for 2 years of safe driving and TH Lancaster for 1 year of safe driving.

 

Each driver was recognized for their dedication to safety by receiving a safety bonus based on the number of years of safe driving that they have achieved recognized each driver. 

Financial Report

 

2009 will go down as one of the most financially challenging years in the existence of ASC.

 

With the country facing the greatest economic challenges since the Great Depression and record budget deficits at every level of government ASC received very disturbing news in May that the Prevention, Retention and Contingency (PRC) and Title Twenty (TXX) contracts with the Scioto County Department of Job and Family Services (SCJFS) were being cancelled due to funding cuts at the State level.

 

Loss of these contracts meant that revenue for the transit system would be cut by some $27,000 per month.

 

Even though the loss of contract revenue has been talked about as inevitable during the past 10-years the suddenness of the event was surprising and not planned for.

 

Only the reduction of staff through attrition, the service cuts that have been made in the previous two years, staff vigilance in watching expenses and lower fuel prices staved off a total financial collapse for ASC.

 

Expenses

 

Operating expenses were reduced over $130,000 from 2008 mainly because of a nearly $52,000 reduction in fuel costs and a $78,478 reduction in payroll costs.

 

The total operating costs for 2009 was $839,073 (including vehicle maintenance)* compared to $969,028 in 2008.

 

* Beginning in 2009 ODOT classified vehicle maintenance as a capital expense and not an operating expense. In the past vehicle maintenance was reported on the quarterly invoice as an operating expense. It is now reported on the operating invoice as a non-eligible expense and is reported as capitalized maintenance expense on a separate invoice and paid with American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) funds. The reimbursement rate is also higher since operating expenses are only reimbursable up to 50% while the expense under the ARRA funding is reimbursable up to 100%. For the purposes of comparison vehicle maintenance has been included in the operating expenses in this report.

 

Operating costs in 2009 included $279,563 in administrative, $46,358 in vehicle maintenance and $513,152 in vehicle operations costs compared to $282,495 in administrative, $42,020 in vehicle maintenance and $644,513 in vehicle operation costs in 2008.  

 

ASC 2009 Vs 2008 Expenses

Expenses

2009

2008

Difference

% of Change

Salaries

 $      394,778

 $      441,458

 $ (46,680)

-11%

Fringes

 $      257,875

 $      289,673

 $ (31,798)

-11%

Pro/Tech Services

 $         14,286

 $        10,177

 $      4,109

40%

Vehicle Maintenance

 $         43,402

 $        39,678

 $      3,724

9%

Fuel

 $         59,887

 $      111,735

 $ (51,848)

-46%

Tires

 $           2,956

 $           2,342

 $          514

22%

Other Supplies

 $           9,160

 $           9,639

 $       (479)

-5%

Utilities

 $         10,320

 $           9,715

 $          605

6%

Travel & Meetings

 $              283

 $                   -

 $          283

100%

Advertising

 $           4,607

 $           4,530

 $            77

2%

Misc. Expenses

 $              440

 $           1,511

 $    (1,071)

-71%

Rent

 $         19,200

 $        19,061

 $          139

1%

In Kind Expense

 $         21,879

 $        29,509

 $    (7,630)

-26%

Total

 $      839,073

 $      969,028

 $(129,955)

-13%

 

 

As in previous years employee payroll and benefits made up the largest percentage of the ASC operating budget in 2009 followed by fuel costs and vehicle maintenance.

 

The total payroll in 2009 was $652,653 including $394,778 in salaries and $257,875 in fringe benefits (PERS, Insurance, Unemployment and Medicare).   The payroll accounted for over 78% of the total ASC Operating Budget.

 

This compares to a payroll totaling $731,131 in 2008.

 

 Revenue

 

In 2008 contract revenue set an all time record making up over 58% of the total revenue collected by ASC.  In 2009 it was a very different story.

 

For the first time in eleven years contract revenue did not make up the largest portion of revenue to operate ASC.  Instead in 2009 Federal assistance made up over 48% of the total revenue while contract revenue only accounted for roughly 41%.

 

Because of the loss of the PRC and Title XX contracts with SCDJFS in May contract revenue dropped from $556,905 in 2008 to $323,924 in 2009.

 

The majority of contract revenue (nearly 68%) for 2009 was generated from the Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) contract.

 

The NEMT contract was the only SCDJFS contract that was renewed in 2009 and provides transportation to those who have a medical card to and from medical related activities.

 

Increases in Federal and State revenue in 2009 helped offset some of the lost contract revenue, however ASC suffered an overall loss of over $173,000 in operating revenue in 2009.

 

Operating revenue in 2009 included $382,393 in Federal assistance, $49,965 in State assistance and $4,058 in State elderly and disabled fare assistance, $323,924 in contract revenue, $30,885 in general public fares and $4,446 in miscellaneous revenue.

 

This compares to $323,316 in Federal assistance, $35,651 in State assistance, $5,592 in State elderly and disabled fare assistance, $556,905 in contract revenue, $46,164 in general public fares and $1,400 in miscellaneous revenue in 2008.


The funding for ASC in 2009 consisted of approximately 41% contract revenue, 48% Federal funds, 6% State funds, 4% general public fares, 1% State elderly and disabled (E&D) funds and 1% miscellaneous revenue.

 

This compares to approximately 58% contract, 33% Federal funds, 4% State funds, 4% general public fares, less than 1% State E&D funds and miscellaneous revenue respectfully in 2008.

 

Due to the loss of contract revenue ASC did a much better job of utilizing the available State and Federal funds in 2009.

 

ASC was eligible for $396,875 in Federal funds and $58,744 in State funds in 2009 and used over 96% of the available Federal funds and 85% of the available State funds.

 

In 2008 ASC was eligible for $363,875 in Federal funds and $61,114 in State funds of which only 89% of the available Federal funds and 58% of the available State funds were utilized.

 

It should be kept in mind that ASC received an additional $43,402 in Federal funds in 2009 for capitalized maintenance.  If the vehicle maintenance expenses would have been reported as an operating expense, as it was in 2008, ASC would have utilized all of the available Federal and State funds, however ASC would have had to come up with an additional $20,141 in local revenue.

 

Because the vehicle maintenance was capitalized and paid for using American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 funds the expense was reimbursed at 100% compared to the 50% reimbursement rate under the operating grant.

 

Given the lack of available additional funds from local sources ASC would have been hard pressed to come up with the additional $20,141.

 

This example shows how advantageous the capitalized maintenance program is to the rural systems in allowing them to take advantage of more Federal funds.

 

The capitalized maintenance program is scheduled to continue in 2010, which will help stretch the available federal funds which is a good thing given that for the ninth year in a row ASC received no financial support from the Scioto County Commissioners.

 

In addition Scioto County was declared to be in Fiscal Emergency in 2009 (the first County in Ohio History) by the Auditor of State’s Office so it is not likely that the Commissioners would be in any position to lend any financial support to ASC, if they be so inclined, in the foreseeable future.

 

In 2008 ASC was eligible for $363,061 in Federal and $61,114 in State grant funds and received only $323,651 and $35,651 in Federal and State grant funds respectfully.

 

Traditional end of the year conditions such as increased expenses, low cash flow and appropriation and cumbersome year end bill paying procedures by the County hamper the ability to incur enough expenses by the end of the year to take full advantage of the available funds.

The situation has been made better by using the accrual method of accounting, which ODOT began requiring in 2009 for all systems to report their operational expenses.

 

It is a balancing act each year to try to anticipate financial problems and make adjustments in order to keep the system operating and avoid going into the whole by the end of the year.

 

Ideally ASC would use all of the available grant funds by the end of the year, however I believe it is better to have some available money left over than have to close down the service due to lack of funds.

 

Hopefully the coming year ASC will be able to take full advantage of the available grant funds.  Given that the full economic impact of the loss of the two SCDJFS contracts will be felt in 2010 ASC will need every extra dollar to make ends meet.

 

ASC saw a 27% decrease in State E&D funds that it received from the previous year dropping from $5,592 in 2008 to $4,058 in 2009.  

Operating Data

 

ASC traveled 207,988 revenue miles and logged 14,851 revenue vehicle hours and transported 47,829 passengers in 2009.

 

This compares to 252,951 revenue miles, 20,524 revenue vehicle hours and 69,991 passengers in 2008.

 

Ridership declined for the second year in a row dropping some 32% from 2008 and slightly over 49% from 2007.

 

The decline in ridership is a result of the lost of the PRC and TXX contracts in May and the service cuts that have been made in the past two years to reduce operating cost.

 

The drop in contract ridership was over 50% from last year dropping from 41,137 to only 20,450 this year.   General public ridership decreased only slightly this year from last dropping just over 5% declining from 28,854 to 27,379 this past year.

 

The decline in general public passengers seems to be leveling off after starting to decline following the elimination of the same day Instant Access service that was part of the service reductions that took place in 2008 in order to help balance the operating budget.

 

While overall contract passengers dropped dramatically passengers transported for SCDJFS under the and Non-Emergency Medical Transportation (NEMT) contract  increased slightly for the second year in a row this year by nearly 10% going from 13,282 in 2008 to 14,609 in 2009.


It had been long anticipated that there would be a significant decline in E&D ridership when TXX funding was eliminated.  The rational for this thinking was that many of the elderly on fixed income that have been at no cost to themselves would not be able to afford to travel on the bus when they would have to pay out of their own pocket.

 

This prediction seems to have been true as E&D ridership declined nearly 20% in 2009.

 

The total number of E&D passengers transported in 2009 was 13,299 including 4,079 contract and 9,220 general public E&D passengers.  This down from 16,569 in 2008 and included 7,948 contract and 8,621general public E&D passengers. 

 

While the number of Elderly and Disabled passengers continued to decline in 2009 they comprised a larger percentage of the overall ridership.  In 2008 E&D passengers accounted for approximately 23% of all passengers, however in 2009 that percentage had increased to nearly 28%. 

Pickup and Drop-off Demographics

 

The majority of passenger trips continued to either originated or terminated in Portsmouth and New Boston again this year.   Pick-up and drop-off locations in Portsmouth accounted for slightly over 67% of all trips, while New Boston locations accounted for slightly over 11% of all trips taken by our passengers in 2009.

The third most popular pick-up and drop-off location again in this year was Wheelersburg accounting for nearly 7% of all trips.

 

Rosemount with 3% of all trips and Sciotoville with 2.8% rounded out the top- five pickup and drop off locations this year.

 

2009 Passengers by Zone

Zone

Total Passengers

General Public

Contract

GP %

Contract %

Total %

Portsmouth

32119

16004

16115

65.0%

69.4%

67.2%

New Boston

5346

3081

2265

12.5%

9.8%

11.2%

Wheelersburg

3149

1868

1281

7.6%

5.5%

6.6%

Lucasville

601

122

479

0.5%

2.1%

1.3%

Valley Twp

289

159

130

0.6%

0.6%

0.6%

Northwest

830

379

451

1.5%

1.9%

1.7%

West Portsmouth

1204

473

731

1.9%

3.1%

2.5%

South Webster

291

137

154

0.6%

0.7%

0.6%

Franklin Furnace

124

68

56

0.3%

0.2%

0.3%

Buena Vista

2

1

1

0.0%

0.0%

0.004%

Friendship

121

52

69

0.2%

0.3%

0.3%

Sciotoville

1316

703

613

2.9%

2.6%

2.8%

Minford

612

401

211

1.6%

0.9%

1.3%

Rosemount

1421

966

455

3.9%

2.0%

3.0%

Morgan Twp

273

97

176

0.4%

0.8%

0.6%

South Shore

96

73

23

0.3%

0.1%

0.2%

Other

35

35

0

0.1%

0.0%

0.1%

Total

47829

24619

23210

100.00%

100.00%

100.00%


Most of the people using ASC in 2009 were traveling to medical appointments; for work, to run personal errands and to go to school or shopping.


Approximately 37% of all trips scheduled in 2009 were related to medical purposes, while 26% were related to employment, followed by 7% for personal reasons and approximately 4% were related to education or shopping respectively.

Performance

 

The Ohio Department of Transportation uses several performance measures to rate the level of service and performance of the various transit systems throughout Ohio.   These measurements include the following:

 

·         Quantity of Service (including Span of Service, Service Area Coverage and Miles per Capita)

 

·         Quality of Service (including Response Time)

 

·         Infrastructure (Including Percentage of Vehicles Beyond Useful Life and Accessibility)

 

·         Safety and Reliability

 

·         Service Effectiveness

 

·         Cost Efficiency

 

·         Cost Effectiveness (Including Cost per Passenger and Farebox Recovery Ratio)

 

·         Local Commitment to Transit

 

In order to assess the level of service and performance of the transit system’s ODOT developed Ohio Public Transit Index (PTI) Service Rating System.

 

The PTI establishes acceptable levels of service and performance for each transit system using an A-F rating scale.  The rating scale is not a traditional “grade” system or ranking but is similar to the one that ODOT uses to rank highways.  In general a “C” or “D” rating means that a transit system is performing at an acceptable level. An “E” rating means that a service measure “needs improvement” and an “F” rating mean that the performance for a particular service measure is “unacceptable”.  

 

 PTI Definitions

 

Quantity of Service:

 

·         Span of Service – number of hours a system is “open” for business.

·         Service Area Coverage – how much area does a system service.

·         Miles per Capita – how many miles per person in the service area does the transit system provide.

Quality of Service:

 

·         Measured by response time for a system that includes the average of the following:

·         Advance reservation requirements

·         Average speed of system vehicles

·         Pick-up window parameters

·         Type of service (i.e. door-to-door, curb-to-curb, etc.

·         Percentage of General public trips

Infrastructure:

 

·         Average of the level of service ratings of percentage of vehicle fleet beyond useful life standards (5-years or 150,000 miles) and percentage of vehicle fleet of which is accessible.

Safety and Reliability:

 

·         Average of the level of service ratings of number of accidents per 100,000 miles and number of vehicle breakdowns or road calls per 100,000.

Service Effectiveness:

 

·         Measured by the average number of passengers transported per hour.

Cost Efficiency:

 

·         Measured by the total cost per mile to operate the system.

 

Cost Effectiveness:

 

·         Measured by the average cost per passenger and farebox revenue vs. total operating costs (farebox recovery ratio).

Local Commitment to Transit:

 

·         Measured by the percentage of total expenditures from local cash sources (as reported on line item 409 of the Rural Operating Invoice).

PTI Level Service Rating Scales

Quantity of Service:

 

·         Span of Service:

-          A = > 7,500 hours (per year)

-          B = 7,500 – 6,000 hours

-          C = 5,999 – 4,500 hours

-          D = 4,499 – 3,000 hours

-          E = 2,999 – 1,500 hours (Needs Improvement)

-          F = < 1,500 hours (Unacceptable)

 

·         Service Area Coverage:

-          A = Seamless regional mobility

-          B = County-wide plus out-of-county destinations

-          C = County-wide service

-          D = City-wide plus limited outside the City

-          E = City limits only (Needs Improvement)

-          F = Less than City limits (Unacceptable)

 

·         Miles per Capita:

-          A = > 10 miles/capita

-          B = 10 – 8 miles/capita

-          C = 7.99 – 6 miles/capita

-          D = 5.99 – 4 miles/capita

-          E = 3.99 – 2 miles/capita (Needs Improvement)

-          F = < 2 miles/capita (Unacceptable)

Quality of Service:

 

·         Advance reservation requirements:

-          A = 0 – 30 minutes

-          B = 31 minutes – 2 hours

-          C = 2.01 hours – 12 hours

-          D = 12.01 hours – 24 hours

-          E = 24.01 hours – 48 hours (Needs Improvement)

-          F = > 48 hours (Unacceptable)

 

 ·         Average speed of system vehicles:

-          A = > 30 mph

-          B = 25 – 30 mph

-          C = 20 – 24.99 mph

-          D = 15 – 19.99 mph

-          E = 10 – 14.99 mph (Needs Improvement)

-          F = < 10 mph (Unacceptable)

 

·         Pick-up window parameters:

-          A = <10 minutes

-          B = 10 – 25 minutes

-          C = 25.01 – 35 minutes

-          D = 35.01 – 45 minutes

-          E = 45.01 – 60 minutes (Needs Improvement)

-          F = > 60 minutes (Unacceptable)

 

·         Type of service:

-          A = Door-to-door plus call to inform passenger vehicle is on its way to pick them up

-          B = Door-to-door

-          C = Curb-to-curb, door-to-door upon request

-          D = Curb-to-curb

-          E = Stop-to-stop (Needs Improvement)

-          F = Door-thru-door (Unacceptable)

·         Percentage of General public trips:

-          A = > 80 %

-          B = 80% - 70%

-          C = 69.99% - 60%

-          D = 59.99% - 50%

-          E = 49.99% - 25% (Needs Improvement)

-          F = < 25% (Unacceptable)

 

Infrastructure:

·         Percentage of Vehicles Beyond Useful Life:

-          A =  < 5%

-          B = 5% - 20%

-          C = 20.01% - 40%

-          D = 40.01% - 60%

-          E = 60.01 – 80% (Needs Improvement)

-          F = 80.01% - 100% (Unacceptable)

 

·         Accessibility:

-          A = 100%

-          B = 80% - 99.99%

-          C = 60% - 79.99%

-          D = 40% - 59.99%

-          E = 20% - 39.99% (Needs Improvement)

-          F = <20% (Unacceptable)

Safety and Reliability:

 

·         Safety:

-          A = 0.0 – 0.59 accidents per 100,000 miles

-          B = 0.6 – 1.19 (Needs Improvement)

-          C = 1.2 – 1.79 (Needs Improvement)

-          D = 1.8 – 2.39 (Needs Improvement)

-          E = 2.4 – 3.0 (Needs Improvement)

-          F = > 3.0 (Unacceptable)

 

·         Reliability:

-          A = < 1 road call per 100,000 miles

-          B = 1 – 2

-          C = 2.01 – 3 (Needs Improvement)

-          D = 3.01 – 4 (Needs Improvement)

-          E = 4.01 – 5 (Needs Improvement)

-          F = > 5 (Unacceptable)

Service Effectiveness:

 

·         Passengers per Hour:

-          A = > 6.37

-          B = 4.97 – 6.37

-          C = 3.58 – 4.96

-          D = 2.19 – 3.57

-          E = 0.8 – 2.18 (Needs Improvement)

-          F = < 0.8 (Unacceptable)

Cost Efficiency:

 

·         Cost per Mile:

-          A = < $1.28

-          B = $1.28 - $1.61

-          C = $1.62 - $1.94

-          D = $1.95 - $2.27

-          E = $2.28 - $2.60 (Needs Improvement)

-          F = > $2.60 (Unacceptable)

Cost Effectiveness:

 

·         Cost per Passenger:

-          A = < $8.00

-          B = $8.01  -  $11.00

-          C = $11.01 - $15.00

-          D = $15.01 - $20.00

-          E = $20.01 - $25.00 (Needs Improvement)

-          F = > $25.01 (Unacceptable)

 

·         Farebox Recovery Ratio:

-          A = > 25%

-          B = 20% - 25%

-          C = 15% - 19.99%

-          D = 10% - 14.99%

-          E = 5% - 9.99% (Needs Improvement)

-          F < 5% (Unacceptable)

Local Commitment to Transit:

 

·         Percentage Total Budget from Local Sources:

-          A = > 30%

-          B = 30% - 20%

-          C = 19.99% - 15%

-          D = 14.99 – 10%

-          E = 9.99% - 5% (Needs Improvement)

-          F = < 5% (Unacceptable)

ASC PTI Ratings 2008 vs. 2009

 

Here are the PTI ratings for Access Scioto County comparing 2008 vs. 2009:

 

Quantity of Service:

 

·         Span of Service:

-          2008 = 2,988 hrs = E (Needed Improvement)

-          2009 = 3,000 hrs = D

 

 

  • Service Area Coverage:

-          2008 = County-wide service = C

-          2009 = County-wide service = C

 

  • Miles per Capita:

-          2008 = 252,951 miles/74,441 pop. = 3.4 = E (Needed Improvement)

-          2009 = 207,988 miles/76,581 pop. = 2.7 = E (Needs Improvement)

 

ASC Quantity of Service Rating:

 

  • 2008 = 4.3 = D
  • 2009 = 4.0 = D

 

Quality of Service:

 

·         Advance reservation requirements:

-          2008 = 24 hrs in advance = D

-          2009 = 24 hrs in advance = D

 

·         Average speed of system vehicles:

-          2008 = 12.3 mph = E (Needed Improvement)

-          2009 = 14.0 mph = E (Needs Improvement)

 

·         Pick-up Window:

-          2008 = 10 – 25 minutes = B

-          2009 = 10 – 25 minutes = B

 

·         Type of Service:

-          2008 = Curb-to-curb, door-to-door on request = C

-          2009 = Curb-to-curb, door-to-door on request = C

·         Percentage of General Public Trips:

-          2008 = 41.2% = E (Needed Improvement)

-          2009 = 57.2% = D

 

ASC Quality of Service Rating:

 

·         2008 = 3.8 = C

·         2009 = 3.6 = C

 

Infrastructure:

 

·         Percentage of Vehicles Beyond Useful Life:

-          2008 3 vehicles out of 14 past useful life = 21% = C

-          2009 4 vehicles out of 14 past useful life = 29% = C

 

·         Percentage of Vehicles that are Accessible:

-          2008 14 vehicles out of 14 were accessible = 100% = A

-          2009 14 vehicles out of 14 were accessible = 100% = A

 

ASC Infrastructure Rating:

 

·         2008 = 2 = B

·         2009 = 2 = B

 

Safety and Reliability:

 

·         Number of Accidents per 100,000 miles:

-          2008 =  1.19 = B

-          2009 =  0.48 = A

 

·         Number of Road Calls per 100,000 miles:

-          2008 =  2.37 = C (Needed Improvement)

-          2009 =  3.37 = D (Needs Improvement)

 

ASC Safety and Reliability Rating:

 

·         2008 = 2.5 =  B

·         2009 = 2.5 = B

 

Service Effectiveness:

 

·         Passengers per Hour:

-          2008 = 3.45 = D

-          2009 = 3.24 = D

 

ASC Service Effectiveness Rating:

 

·         2008 = D

·         2009 = D

 

Cost Efficiency:

 

·         Cost per Mile:

-          2008 = $3.87 = F (Unacceptable)

-          2009 = $3.83 = F (Unacceptable)

 

ASC Cost Efficiency:

 

·         2008 = F (Unacceptable)

·         2009 = F (Unacceptable)

 

Cost Effectiveness:

 

  • Cost per Passenger:

-          2008 = $14.09 = C

-          2009 = $16.70 = D

 

  • Farebox Recovery Ratio:

-          2008 = $46,164/$969,027 = 4.8% = F (Unacceptable)

-          2009 = $30,885/$795,671 = 3.9% = F (Unacceptable)

 

ASC Cost Effectiveness Rating:

 

  • 2008 = 4.5 = D
  • 2009 = 5    = E (Needs Improvement)

Local Commitment to Transit:

 

  • Percentage of Total Expenditures from Local Cash (Line 409 Operating Invoice)

-          2008 = 0% = F (Unacceptable)

-          2009 = 0% = F (Unacceptable)

 

Local Commitment to Transit Rating:

 

  • 2008 = 6 = F (Unacceptable)
  • 2009 = 6 = F (Unacceptable)

 

 

 

 

ASC PTI Profile 2008 vs. 2009

 

Service Rating Criteria

2008

2009

Needs Improvement

Unacceptable

Quantity of Service

  • Span of Service
  • Service Area Coverage
  • Miles per Capita

 

 

 

D

 

 

 

D

 

 

Quality of Service

  • Response Time

 

C

 

C

 

 

Infrastructure

  • % Beyond Useful Life
  • Accessibility

 

 

B

 

 

B

 

 

Safety and Reliability

  • Accidents per 100,000 miles
  • Road calls per 100,000 miles

 

 

A

 

 

B

 

 

Service Effectiveness

  • Passengers per Hour

 

D

 

D

 

 

Cost Efficiency

  • Cost per Mile

 

F

 

F

 

 

X

Cost Effectiveness

  • Cost per Passenger
  • Farebox Recovery Ratio

 

 

D

 

 

E

 

 

 

X

Local Commitment to Transit

F

F

 

X

 

ASC Overall PTI Profile Rating: 

 

  • 2008 ASC Overall PTI Profile Rating = C (3.5)
  • 2009 ASC Overall PTI Profile Rating = C (3.5) 

Capital Improvements

 

 

In 2009 ASC was awarded $175,270 in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 funds for capital projects.

 

The funds are to help in funding the purchase of a light transit vehicle, bus security systems, roof replacement, installation of accessible doors and ceiling rehab at the ASC office building and capitalized vehicle maintenance.

 

The only project that was completed in 2009 was the capitalized maintenance, which totaled $43,402.

 

The remainder of the capital projects hopefully will be completed in 2010.

Goals for 2009

The following goals have been established by ASC to help improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the transit system:  

1. Maintain Trip Denials below 3-percent of total annual trips.

 

ASC met this goal with Trip Denials accounting for .1% of the total annual trips in 2009.

 

2. Maintain No Show rate below 3-percent of total annual trips.

 

ASC did not meet this goal as the No Show rate for 2009 was 3%.

 

3. Increase the average number of Passengers per Hour by 3-percent from 2008 total of 3.45 passengers per hour.

 

ASC did not meet this goal because the average was 3.24 passengers per hour in 2009.

 

4. Maintain the Average Ride time near or below 17-minutes per passenger.

 

ASC did not meet this goal because the average ride time in 2009 was 18.63 minutes.


Goals for 2010

The following goals have been established by ASC to help improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the transit system:  

1. Maintain Trip Denials below 3-percent of total annual trips.

2. Maintain No Show rate below 3-percent of total annual trips.

3. Increase cost effectiveness by lowering the cost per mile to $2.60 or below.

4. Increase cost effectiveness by reducing the cost per passenger to $15.00 or less.

5. Increase cost effectiveness by increasing the farebox recovery ratio to at least 5%.

6. Reduce the average ride time below 18-minutes per passenger.

Conclusion

While 2009 was the most financially challenging year in the history of ASC 2010 may prove to be even more of a struggle as the financial outlook is uncertain at best.

 

There will be very little margin for error in 2010 as the operating budget was cut to the bone in order to attempt to maintain service at its current level with the available funding.

 

The 2010 operating budget is $780,296 including $52,500 for vehicle maintenance.  

 

That is quite a reduction when you consider the operating budget just two years ago in 2008 was over $969,000.

 

The line item of most concern is that of fuel.  In 2009 $59,887 was spent on fuel and it is predicated that fuel prices could increase between 20 and 28% in 2010.

 

The 2010 ASC budget contains $74,850 for fuel which falls within the predicated cost increase, however if the cost of fuel skyrockets like it did in 2008 it would spell economic disaster for ASC.   

 

With many economists predicating a very slow recovery to the current national recession and some predicating that things might get worse before they get better it is difficult to be very optimistic.

 

Added to the uncertainty is that 2010 is an election year in Ohio and unemployment and economic recovery will be two very key issues.  It is hard to predict what affect the upcoming election might have on the fiscal policies of those currently in office as they try to garner more votes.

 

Those effects may have a very positive or negative effect on funding for ASC at both the State and Federal levels.

 

Federal funding of ASC has substantially increased during the past decade increasing from $110,456 in 2001 to $396,875 in 2009. 

 

While the Federal allocation for 2010 is only $349,434 ASC will also be eligible for $55,920 in Federal funds for capitalized maintenance. 

 

Thanks to the generosity of ODOT officials ASC will receive a large increase in the availability of State funds for 2010. 

 

ASC will be eligible for up to $90,217 in State funds in 2010 compared to $58,744 in 2009.  ODOT understands the situation ASC will be in having lost a large portion of its revenue and this increase should afforded ASC a little breathing room to help adjust to the lower revenue levels in 2010. 

 

For the first time ever, ASC had to compete for the contracts to transport passengers for SCJFS with other transportation providers in 2009.

 

ASC will have to apply again in May of 2010 to SCDJFS for renewal of the NEMT Contract that will run from July 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011.

 

Failure to gain renewal of the NEMT contract would be devastating for the transit system and would result in more service cuts and possibly the shutdown of the system.

 

The continued lack of local financial support and the absence of a long-term strategy to provide such support will continue to be a threat to the survival of the transit system in 2010.

 

This situation will undoubtedly continue in the future due to the fact with the County in fiscal emergency it is not reasonable to assume that the Commissioners will be in a position to help fund ASC anytime soon.

 

Many service cuts were made in 2008 and 2009 that adversely affected the level of service provided by ASC. 

 

It is clear that because of these cuts ASC is not doing as good of a job of meeting the transportation needs of the citizens of Scioto County as it had in the past.

 

Hopefully no additional service cuts will be necessary in 2010, however given the precarious status of ASC more cuts in service may have to be made in 2010. 

 

The most likely next cut will be to eliminate another day of service.  The most likely day would be Friday since it is currently the day of fewest trips.

 

It is hoped that this service cut can be avoided at all costs due to the long term ill effects and ramifications it would have for the transit system.

 

The best case scenario would be that 2010 would be financially similar to 2009.  This would enable us to maintain our service at the current levels without any additional cuts.  

 

Even though the challenges were many in 2009 ASC continued to be an effective and vital organization that helped many people in our community by providing personal mobility and freedom that enabled them to maintain their independence, take advantage of opportunities and to make their own life choices.